The story behind the coin
The idea was older than the coin. Back in 1806, a Connecticut senator named Uriah Tracy pushed a bill for two new denominations the country didn't have — a two-cent piece and a "double dime," our twenty cents. His plan was to make the small coins of billon: low-grade silver, mostly copper with a little silver mixed in. The Mint's director, Robert Patterson, didn't like it. Billon was hard to refine back into clean metal once you melted the coins down. Tracy's bill passed the Senate twice and died in the House both times.
For thirty years, nothing. Then in 1835 Treasury Secretary Levi Woodbury dusted the idea off and ordered the Mint to actually make the coins — to strike patterns, trial pieces meant to show lawmakers what a finished coin would look like and what it would be made of. A pattern is a coin the Mint produces to test or sell an idea, not to spend. The director who got that order was Robert M. Patterson — by a quirk of history, the son of the man who had argued against the same coin in 1806.
So in 1836 the Philadelphia Mint struck two-cent patterns in billon. And here the argument came back. To find out whether the alloy could be trusted, engraver Christian Gobrecht and the Mint's melter and refiner, Franklin Peale, ran experiments on it. The conclusion was the coin's undoing: a billon two-cent piece would be easy to counterfeit. A faker could press out a copy in plain copper, with no silver at all, and an ordinary person handling it would never know the difference. The two-cent piece was dropped from the bill before it passed. The denomination would not become real money until 1864 — a different coin entirely, born of a Civil War coin shortage.
