5 Pfennig (Pattern) obverse5 Pfennig (Pattern) reverse
Germany (1871-1948)

5 Pfennig (Pattern)

Germany (1871-1948)

Every listing identified by its certification barcode — a verifiable fact, not a guess.

The coin

The story

The 1925 5 Pfennig pattern: Germany's road not taken

By 1925, Germany had already decided what its new five-pfennig coin should look like. Someone at the Muldenhütten mint struck this one anyway — in a different metal, with an eagle's head instead of wheat, and a denomination that the currency law of the year before had quietly made obsolete.

The story behind the coin

Germany had just come out the other side of the worst inflation in its history. In late 1923 the paper mark had collapsed to nothing; the emergency Rentenmark stopped the fall, and on 30 August 1924 a new currency law made the Reichsmark the country's legal tender, divided into a hundred Reichspfennig. A whole set of small coins had to be designed, approved and struck in a hurry, for six mints spread across the country.

The design chosen for the five was the work of the sculptor Waldemar Raemisch: six ears of grain leaning together into a taut, angular pattern on one side, the value in a square framed by four oak leaves on the other. It went into production in 1924 in aluminium bronze — a warm, brassy copper-aluminium alloy — as Jaeger 316, and it stayed in production, on and off, until 1936. Hundreds of millions were made.

So a pattern — a trial piece struck to test a design, a metal or a machine, never meant for your pocket — dated 1925 is a small puzzle. This one carries the mint mark E, for Muldenhütten, the old Saxon state mint near Freiberg. It is struck in copper-nickel, not the adopted aluminium bronze. Its obverse (the heads side) shows an eagle's head facing left with DEUTSCHES REICH, not Raemisch's grain. And its reverse reads simply 5 PFENNIG — not Reichspfennig, the legally correct word since the previous August.

Why it was made, the record does not say. The honest reading is that the new coinage was still being argued over after it launched: the metal, the wording and the imagery were all live questions, and mints and medallists kept proposing. We would rather tell you that plainly than invent a committee meeting.

The design and collector appeal

Two Saxon names are attached to this piece, and together they explain a lot about how it came to exist. The obverse is credited to Friedrich Wilhelm Hörnlein (1873–1945), coin engraver at the Muldenhütten mint from 1911 and one of the last German medallists who cut his designs straight into the steel die by hand — a skill he had learned engraving hunting guns. The reverse is credited to Emil Paul Börner (1888–1970), the Meissen sculptor and painter best known for the porcelain emergency money of 1920–21, which Hörnlein had helped bring into production. These two had worked together for years, a few miles apart. A trial coin from Muldenhütten in 1925 bearing both their names is exactly what that partnership would produce.

Physically it is a small, dense thing: 2.52 g, 18.04 mm across, with a reeded edge — the fine vertical grooves milled into the rim. That is almost exactly the size of the circulating five, but copper-nickel is heavier than aluminium bronze, so it sits a fraction weightier in the hand. Side by side with a common 1925 five-pfennig piece, the difference in colour is immediate: silvery-grey against brassy gold.

The appeal, for a collector, is the contrast itself. The adopted coin is one of the most ordinary objects in German numismatics. This one is the version of it that lost.

Key facts

Issuer
Germany (Weimar Republic), catalogued under Germany 1871–1948
Type
Pattern (Probe) — a trial strike, never issued for circulation
Year
1925
Mint / mark
Muldenhütten, Saxony — mint mark E
Composition
Copper-nickel
Weight / diameter
2.52 g / 18.04 mm
Edge
Reeded
Obverse
Eagle's head facing left, DEUTSCHES REICH — Friedrich Wilhelm Hörnlein
Reverse
5 / PFENNIG / 1925 / E — Emil Paul Börner
Catalogue reference
Schaaf 316 G1 (the standard German pattern catalogue)
Mintage
Not recorded in the published sources we could verify
The adopted coin instead
5 Reichspfennig, Jaeger 316 — aluminium bronze, 2.5 g, 18 mm, designed by Waldemar Raemisch, struck 1924–1936

Why collectors care

Patterns are where you see a state thinking out loud. Circulating coins show you the decision; patterns show you the alternatives that were on the table when the decision was made. For Weimar Germany — a republic rebuilding its money from ruins in 1924 — that is not a small thing to hold.

There is also the naming detail, which is genuinely diagnostic. 5 PFENNIG rather than 5 REICHSPFENNIG dates this piece to a moment when the vocabulary of the new currency was not yet settled in every workshop, or when the proposal deliberately reached back to the older, plainer word. Either way, the legend is the reason a specialist can place the coin at a glance.

Then there is scarcity, which for patterns is usually severe and usually undocumented. Trial strikes were made in handfuls, most were destroyed, and the survivors reach the market through German specialist auctions rather than general dealers. Numista rates this type among the rarest things its members hold. That is a proxy for scarcity, not a mintage figure, and we will not dress it up as one.

We do not publish values. Prices for pattern coins move with the auction record and with condition, and condition on a trial piece is a specialist judgement — assess it from a certified, encapsulated example (a coin professionally graded and sealed in a holder) with the pattern attribution stated on the label, not from a photograph.

A last word on the reference: the number to know is the Schaaf catalogue, the standard work for German trial and pattern strikes since 1871. Schaaf numbers follow the Jaeger number of the related circulating coin, which is why this piece is 316 G1 — 316 being the adopted five-Reichspfennig. It will rarely carry a KM number of its own.

Questions collectors ask

What is a pattern coin, and did this one ever circulate?

A pattern — Probe in German — is a trial strike made to test a proposed design, alloy or size before a coinage is approved. It is not legal tender and was never meant to be spent. This 1925 five-pfennig piece never circulated; the coin Germany actually used was Waldemar Raemisch's wheat-ear 5 Reichspfennig in aluminium bronze.

Why does it say 5 PFENNIG and not 5 REICHSPFENNIG?

The currency law of 30 August 1924 named the new subdivision the Reichspfennig, and the circulating coin used that word. This trial piece uses the older, plainer 'Pfennig'. That difference is one of the quickest ways to tell the pattern from the ordinary coin, and it points to a design proposal that was outside the settled wording.

What does the mint mark E mean?

E is the mark of Muldenhütten, the Saxon state mint near Freiberg — one of six German mints active in the Weimar period, alongside A (Berlin), D (Munich), F (Stuttgart), G (Karlsruhe) and J (Hamburg). Muldenhütten is where Friedrich Wilhelm Hörnlein worked as engraver.

How rare is it, and what is it worth?

No mintage figure for this pattern appears in the sources we can verify, which is normal for trial strikes — they were made in very small numbers. It is genuinely scarce and trades through German specialist auctions. We do not publish values; check recent auction results and work from a certified example rather than an estimate.

Is it the same as the 1925 nickel pattern with the wheat-ear design?

No. A separate 1925 pattern exists from Karlsruhe (mint mark G), struck in nickel, using Raemisch's adopted design — that one looks like a metal trial for a coin already decided. This Muldenhütten piece is a different proposal entirely: different mint, different metal, different imagery, different legend.

Sources