US coin · series

The 1792 Copper Disme: the dime before the dime

A copper prototype from the first months of the United States Mint — the coin that named the dime.

The 1792 Copper Disme: the dime before the dime
National Numismatic Collection, National Museum of American History (photograph by Jaclyn Nash) · public domain · source

Before there was a dime, there was a disme. In 1792, in a half-built Mint on a Philadelphia side street, someone pressed a copper blank between hand-cut dies and made the first ten-cent coin the United States ever produced. Fewer than two dozen survive. Each one is a fingerprint from the day American money began.

The story behind the coin

In the spring of 1792, the United States had a constitution, a president, and almost no money of its own. Spanish silver dollars, British coppers, and a confusion of state and foreign coins changed hands in the markets. Congress wanted something American — and on April 2, 1792, it passed the Coinage Act, the law that built the Mint and laid out a decimal system of dollars, cents, and tenths.

That "tenth" had a name: the disme. The word is old French for a tithe — a tenth part — and it was probably said something like "deem." Within a few years the spelling relaxed into the word we use now. The dime. So the disme is not a curiosity off to the side of American coinage. It is the dime's birth certificate.

What survives from that first year is not a circulating coin. It is a pattern — a trial piece, struck to test a design and show it to the people who decided whether to approve it. The Mint struck the disme mostly in copper, a cheap metal, instead of the silver a real dime would carry. A few copper pieces could be made fast and handed to officials and influential men without spending precious metal. That is why a ten-cent coin exists in copper at all, and why it was never spent: it was an argument made in metal, not a coin made for a pocket.

A handful of dismes were also struck in silver — the closest thing to "the real thing" the Mint ever made of this design. Those are rarer still.

The design and who made it

Pick up a copper disme and the obverse — the heads side — shows Liberty in profile, facing left, her hair loose and flowing. Around her runs a sentence, not a slogan: LIBERTY PARENT OF SCIENCE & INDUS. with the date 1792. Liberty as the mother of knowledge and work — an Enlightenment idea, stamped on the first dime. The same wording, and the same loose-haired Liberty, appears on the famous 1792 Birch cent, which ties the disme to that small group of founding designs.

Flip it over. The reverse carries a small eagle, wings spread, seeming to hover more than soar — an early, slightly awkward bird, a long way from the confident eagles of later coinage. Above it: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Below it: DISME. The edge is reeded — grooved with fine vertical lines — on most surviving copper pieces; a very few have a plain edge.

Who actually cut the dies — the hardened steel stamps that pressed the design into each blank — is one of the genuine unsolved questions of early American numismatics. Several names are tied to the 1792 coinage in Mint records and later scholarship: Robert Birch (the engraver behind the Birch cent, whose "Parent of Science" wording matches the disme), Adam Eckfeldt (a Mint mechanic and diesinker present from the very first days), and Henry Voigt (the Mint's first chief coiner). Different catalogues and references favor different attributions, and the records are too thin to settle it. The honest answer is that the disme was made by the small, improvising crew of a brand-new Mint, and we cannot point with certainty to the hand that engraved it.

Key facts

Denomination
Disme (ten cents) — the prototype dime
Year struck
1792
Status
Pattern (trial piece), never issued for circulation
Composition
Copper (a few also struck in silver)
Edge
Reeded (most copper pieces); a few plain edge
Obverse
Liberty facing left, flowing hair — "LIBERTY PARENT OF SCIENCE & INDUS. 1792"
Reverse
Small spread-wing eagle — "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / DISME"
Designer / engraver
Disputed — variously attributed to Robert Birch, Adam Eckfeldt, or Henry Voigt
Catalog references
Copper reeded edge Judd-10 / Pollock-11; copper plain edge Judd-11; silver Judd-9 / Pollock-10
Estimated survivors (copper)
Roughly the mid-teens to about two dozen — counts vary by source

Collecting it

This is not a coin you complete a set with. It is a coin a serious collector might own one of, once, if the opportunity and the means ever line up. The whole population of copper dismes is small — published estimates run from the mid-teens to about two dozen, with the silver pieces rarer still. There are no "common dates" here, because there is only one date: 1792.

That scarcity is structural, not accidental. Patterns were made in tiny numbers on purpose — just enough to show the design and persuade a few decision-makers. Most of what was struck has been lost over two centuries. What remains is split among a few collectors, dealers, and museums, including the national collection at the Smithsonian.

High grades are scarce for a reason worth understanding. The Mint was new, the equipment was improvised, and copper is a soft metal that bruises and tones over time. A piece that survived 230-plus years with sharp detail and clean surfaces is extraordinary. The finest known copper disme — graded gem and traced back through the James Ellsworth collection — is famous in its own right, and a second-finest example sold at auction in August 2022 for $900,000. When a copper disme appears at all, it tends to make news.

For a collector, the appeal is not condition-census trophy hunting. It is provenance and meaning: holding the object at the literal start of United States coinage. Because so few exist and they trade so rarely, authentication and a documented pedigree matter more here than almost anywhere else in the series — the chain of past owners is part of what a genuine example is worth.

Questions collectors ask

What is a 'disme' — and is it the same as a dime?

Yes. 'Disme' is the original 1792 spelling of the ten-cent denomination, from an old French word for a tithe — a tenth part. It was probably pronounced close to 'deem.' Within a few years the spelling and sound settled into 'dime.' The 1792 disme is the direct ancestor of every dime since.

Why was a ten-cent coin struck in copper instead of silver?

Because it was a pattern — a trial piece, not money. The Mint struck dismes mostly in cheap copper so it could quickly produce a few examples to show off the design without spending silver. A real circulating dime would have been silver. A few silver dismes were made too, and they are rarer.

Who designed the 1792 disme?

It is genuinely uncertain. The design — flowing-haired Liberty with the 'Parent of Science & Industry' legend — is closely tied to Robert Birch, who engraved the 1792 Birch cent. But Adam Eckfeldt and Henry Voigt, two of the Mint's first employees, are also credited in various sources. The early Mint's records are too thin to settle the question.

How many 1792 copper dismes still exist?

Only a small number. Published estimates for the copper pieces range from the mid-teens to roughly two dozen, with the silver examples rarer still. There is no agreed exact figure, and no 'common' version — there is just the one year, 1792.

Was the 1792 disme ever actually used as money?

No. It was never released for circulation. It was made to illustrate and propose a design. That is exactly why it survives in such high grades when it survives at all — these pieces were kept and handed around, not spent and worn.

Sources